data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/56f33/56f338de60e2ce71b5166c8428c1536c4ab14b08" alt=""
2001: A
Space Odyssey
Rated: G
CAST: Keir Dullea, Gary
Lockwood, William Sylvester, Daniel Richter, Douglas
Rain, Leonard Rossiter
DIRECTOR: Stanley Kubrick
SYNOPSIS:
The film has four parts. The first section
is the dawn of man. Man-apes are taught to use tools and
kill by an imposing black monolith. In the second part, a
second black monolith is found buried in the moon by
astronauts in the year 2001. This leads to a mission to
Jupiter by another team of astronauts and a talkative,
emotional computer named Hal. The final and most surreal
part has astronaut Dave traveling to the infinite and
beyond.
REVIEW:
Critics hated this movie when it first saw
theatrical release. Audiences - particularly hippies high
on acid dug the psychedelic special effects scene at the
end and thus made it a box office hit. Years later, one
would be hard pressed for a critic who admits to
disliking this film. It has made the so-called
"canon" of critics' favourite films.
But how does this film look today,
almost 30 years later, to audiences weaned on the special
effects wizardry of Star Wars and its ilk? Except for
perhaps a midnight showing at some obscure cult cinema,
audiences are also unlikely to see the film as it is
supposed to be seen: on the BIG screen.
No, it doesn't look as good on video or television as it
should. As far as special effects go, it pales in
comparison to Star Wars and many films made afterwards.
Sure, some of the Sixties fashions look terribly
dated. Okay, there are some terribly slow moving bits
that will drive audiences crazy.
Is it a good movie? Of course! 2001 has survived for the
same reason it made such a splash back in the late 1960s:
its bewildering and wilfully obscure screenplay. The
story (or lack thereof - depending on whether you liked
the film or not) drove critics to distraction. What is
Kubrick trying to say? What is the message? Who knows?
But this is the kind of movie that will give audiences
plenty to talk about afterwards - something few of
today's formulaic films can manage. For this alone it is
worth seeing.
LAST WORD:
2001 is pure unadulterated sci-fi and
there's nothing like it and probably never will be
again . . . and that includes 2010, the 1984 sequel
to it!
CREDITS:
Sci Fi Movie Page
|